stabilise ?, attributes on stmts, deprecate Reflect#36995
stabilise ?, attributes on stmts, deprecate Reflect#36995bors merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Manishearth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, not sure if libs/lang team folks need to sign off. r=me otherwise
src/librustc/diagnostics.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
doesn't this text apply to ? as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe he removed it because its not accurate anymore: #36988
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, annoyingly you get an error message about the Carrier trait
src/libcore/macros.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
propogation -> propagation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
?is built in to the language and is more succinct thantry!, it is the standard method for error propogation.
These are two separate sentences and probably shouldn't be separated by a comma.
|
For the sake of cross-linking, here's the link to the tracking issue: #31436 |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #36945) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
This looks good to me, though I do think we ought to try and address #36988. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit adb4e2f has been approved by |
|
What's the type inference situation? It used to be that replacing Has this been cratered to look for such issues? |
|
@bluss good point, I had mis-remembered this issue. We have indeed done a bunch of Crater runs, but to test whether @bors: r- |
cc [`?` tracking issue](rust-lang#31436)
Note that attributes on expressions are still unstable and are behind the `stmt_expr_attributes` flag. cc [Tracking issue](rust-lang#15701)
[tracking issue](rust-lang#27749)
|
📌 Commit 79b5177 has been approved by |
stabilise ?, attributes on stmts, deprecate Reflect r? @nikomatsakis
Reflect is no longer required as of rust-lang/rust#36995.
r? @nikomatsakis