Increase verbosity when using update syntax with private fields#70331
Increase verbosity when using update syntax with private fields#70331bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
|
r? @estebank (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Can you run Otherwise, LGTM. |
| self.tcx.def_path_str(def.did) | ||
| ) | ||
| .span_label(span, "private field") | ||
| .span_label(span, label) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought span_label only took &str.
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Sorry about that |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 17b97ee has been approved by |
Increase verbosity when using update syntax with private fields Resolves rust-lang#70323
|
⌛ Testing commit 17b97ee with merge 3abeeca22d8d17699eb4a8abbde2222c8fd8ff3f... |
|
@bors retry |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#70331 (Increase verbosity when using update syntax with private fields) - rust-lang#70349 (move `hir_id_validation` to `rustc_passes` + simplify `hir::map` code) - rust-lang#70361 (Update backtrace crate to 0.3.46) - rust-lang#70364 (resolve: Remove `rustc_attrs` as a standalone feature gate) - rust-lang#70369 (Fix smaller issues with invalid placeholder type errors) - rust-lang#70373 (normalize some imports & prefer direct ones) - rust-lang#70376 (Add test for rust-lang#66312) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Resolves #70323