Skip to content

Clean up E0759 explanation#75702

Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
GuillaumeGomez:cleanup-e0759
Aug 20, 2020
Merged

Clean up E0759 explanation#75702
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
GuillaumeGomez:cleanup-e0759

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Aug 19, 2020

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 19, 2020
pickfire
pickfire reviewed Aug 19, 2020
View reviewed changes
src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0759.md
@@ -5,14 +5,11 @@ Erroneous code examples:
```compile_fail,E0759
use std::fmt::Debug;
Copy link
Contributor

@pickfire pickfire Aug 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this still needs Debug? I saw that the rest have the use removed. Oh looks like it is not needed below because it was merged.

Copy link
Member Author

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez Aug 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

;)

@pickfire
Copy link
Contributor

pickfire commented Aug 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

A 'static requirement in a return type involving a trait is not fulfilled.

In my humble opinion, I feel like that needs some change to make it easier to read. Maybe?

Return type involving a trait did not require 'static lifetime.

@pickfire
Copy link
Contributor

pickfire commented Aug 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

These examples have the same semantics as the following:

I feel like that should be changed to something like. I don't understand how "same semantics" is part of the context, I can only see that it is a fix for the above code because of the ok! comment. Maybe?

Add 'static requirement to fix it:

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

GuillaumeGomez commented Aug 20, 2020

Updated!

pickfire
pickfire approved these changes Aug 20, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@pickfire pickfire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

GuillaumeGomez commented Aug 20, 2020

@bors: r=pickfire rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 20, 2020

📌 Commit 7f55c83 has been approved by pickfire

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 20, 2020
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2020
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#75747 - cuviper:rollup-icke90l, r=cuviper
3323691 
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#75672 (Move to intra-doc links for task.rs and vec.rs)
 - rust-lang#75702 (Clean up E0759 explanation)
 - rust-lang#75703 (Enable stack-overflow detection on musl for non-main threads)
 - rust-lang#75710 (Fix bad printing of const-eval queries)
 - rust-lang#75716 (Upgrade Emscripten on CI to 1.39.20 )
 - rust-lang#75731 (Suppress ty::Float in MIR comments of ty::Const)
 - rust-lang#75733 (Remove duplicated alloc vec bench push_all_move)
 - rust-lang#75743 (Rename rustc_lexer::TokenKind::Not to Bang)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit ba104d2 into rust-lang:master Aug 20, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the cleanup-e0759 branch August 20, 2020 20:45
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@pickfire pickfire pickfire approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.47.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@GuillaumeGomez @pickfire @bors @cuviper @rust-highfive @Dylan-DPC-zz