Merged
Conversation
Member
|
30 second review: the errors from CI are Two points:
|
9b4ee57 to
648bc51
Compare
648bc51 to
1ababd8
Compare
jyn514
reviewed
Aug 21, 2020
Member
jyn514
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly looks great, a couple suggestions. There's one broken link I'm very confused how rustdoc didn't catch.
fbe9585 to
5ead554
Compare
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup Thanks for the PR! |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 5ead554a572cea8067e5633fe61b7500eb31fcf7 has been approved by |
Contributor
Author
|
@jyn514 The following link isn’t resolved properly; Could you r-? I can’t fix it immediately |
Member
|
@bors r- |
5ead554 to
e0b7b9f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@jyn514 Should be good now 🤞 |
jyn514
reviewed
Aug 21, 2020
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
e0b7b9f to
97072c6
Compare
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup Thanks for the PR! Congratulations on taking on so many files in your first intra-doc PR 😆 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 97072c6 has been approved by |
Contributor
Author
That was nothing compared to #73622 🙄 |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2020
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#75705 (Move to intra-doc links for /library/core/src/intrinsics.rs) - rust-lang#75711 (Split `astconv.rs` into its own submodule) - rust-lang#75718 (Don't count variants/fields/consts/associated types in doc-coverage doc examples) - rust-lang#75725 (Use intra-doc-links in `alloc`) - rust-lang#75745 (Remove duplication in `fold_item`) - rust-lang#75753 (Another motivation for CFG: return-oriented programming) - rust-lang#75769 (Minor, remove double nesting of a test module) - rust-lang#75771 (Extend normalization in const-eval-query-stack test) - rust-lang#75781 (More inline asm register name fixups for LLVM) - rust-lang#75782 (Convert core/src/str/pattern.rs to Intra-doc links) - rust-lang#75787 (Use intra-doc-links in `core::ops::*`) - rust-lang#75788 (MIR call terminator represents diverging calls too) Failed merges: - rust-lang#75773 (Introduce expect snapshot testing library into rustc) r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I didn't have time to test this, so I will let the CI do it for me.
r? @jyn514 cc #75080