Conversation
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt. |
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@Xanewok Would you consider applying and including rust-lang/rls#1732 in this, please? |
8e2b393 to
cdf8207
Compare
Done :) |
|
@Xanewok Thanks! |
cdf8207 to
5ad58cd
Compare
|
I'm confused, Should we approve it and see if this makes it past bors or should we wait for #82208 to land? |
|
I have no preference on whether to land this or #82208 first; it might be faster to land this though since it's just a routine bump and 82208 still needs review for the bootstrap changes. |
|
Let's try it then: @bors r+ p=1 |
|
📌 Commit 5ad58cd059be13728813dab1332795cafbb10ce9 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 5ad58cd059be13728813dab1332795cafbb10ce9 with merge 1439d5a0a3b533108d9399447b5292ffa79ead5d... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
Looks like a rustfmt test failure, cc @calebcartwright |
|
It doesn't seem like we'll add back the support for inner attributes in that context in time before we need to fix the toolstate, correct? Should we ignore these tests for now? |
|
Yeah I'll remove those snippets from our set of test files; no point keeping around something the parser won't accept and we can always add them back if something changes. I'll patch it in rustfmt here in a little bit |
|
Have updated rustfmt and opened rust-lang/rls#1734 in RLS to pull in the updates Edit - actually I guess the RLS PR isn't really needed to address things here since it's just tests on the rustfmt side. Let me know/feel free to close that RLS PR if you'd prefer to only update the rustfmt submod |
5ad58cd to
dcaf74b
Compare
|
Updated the Rustfmt rev both here and in the RLS (it's nice to migrate to a new version in unison), so let's try again: @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit dcaf74b has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📣 Toolstate changed by #84886! Tested on commit 24acc38. 🎉 rls on windows: build-fail → test-pass (cc @Xanewok). |
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@24acc38. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#84886> 🎉 rls on windows: build-fail → test-pass (cc @Xanewok). 🎉 rls on linux: build-fail → test-pass (cc @Xanewok). 🎉 rustfmt on windows: build-fail → test-pass (cc @calebcartwright @topecongiro). 🎉 rustfmt on linux: build-fail → test-pass (cc @calebcartwright @topecongiro).
…crum [beta] Prepare beta 1.53.0 Along with updating the channel and updating the bootstrap compiler, this also includes: * 692454d - Fixes the diagnostics difference we had for some cycles already * 9157430 - Disables the known broken RLS builder on AArch64 Windows * rust-lang#84183 - Update RELEASES.md for 1.52.0 * rust-lang#84950 - Revert PR 83866 * rust-lang#84886 - Update RLS and Rustfmt Changes we backported to 1.52.0 that we also need to include in 1.53.0 to avoid regressing: * rust-lang#84867 - rustdoc: revert deref recur to resume inclusion of impl ExtTrait<Local> for ExtType * rust-lang#84759 - [beta] remove assert_matches * rust-lang#83171 - Revert PR 81473 to resolve (on beta) issues 81626 and 81658. r? `@ghost`
Closes #84537. Closes #84538.
I know there's #82208 in progress but I'm not sure which we want to land first.
Also, I'm getting Rustfmt test failures due to inner attributes not permitted:
Details
but let's see what CI says, first.
cc @calebcartwright