Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFOREWP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Human Rights Activists in Iran

Human Rights Activists in Iran (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally listed for QD ('A3-Copied from another Wikipedia, without simplification'). I do think this needs discussiion though: There is an article at en:Human Rights Activists in Iran, and in other organizations. The EnWP arrticle mainly uses primary sources, though. So, the very basic question: is this organization notable, and if so, can we write an article (that is more than the 2-3 sentences we currently have), and that uses reliable secondary sources? - Note also that the the original QD was contested, so tan RfD is the way to go. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:18, 4 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vanina Guerillot

Vanina Guerillot (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:ATHLETE. Barras talk 21:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:48, 3 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Long Lake Library

Long Lake Library (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this library branch. Provided sources are primary in nature. Coverage in outside sources seems to be routine local news. No claim to notability in article. En. handles this as a redirect to the county system it is a part of. Reasonable outcome here as well. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Comment: I've personally seen no issue in primary sources, as they are just describing the history of a rather uncontrovertial building. I see no reason why the fact that by this being narrated by Hennepin County Library themselves changes the credibility of this specific case. Nevertheless, I do understand the concerns of notability of the article. Thanks :) Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 00:45, 31 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Radhika Muthukumar

Radhika Muthukumar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notable roles, doesn't pass WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 04:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

She has lead roles in 4 shows out of which two of them are prominent shows, isn't that enough to pass WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleyamma38 (talk • contribs) 12:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Violetta Shostak

Violetta Shostak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Technically there's a claim of notability here I think. I don't see any evidence of this person passing the WP:GNG however. Garsh (talk) 02:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:25, 29 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

HELLO (BPM) 2026

HELLO (BPM) 2026 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ieditrandomarticles has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notability Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:02, 29 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jason Ojalvó

Jason Ojalvó (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 10:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:14, 28 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mexty.Ai

Mexty.Ai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable company. Very little coverage outside of those that are primary or routine reviews. Fails WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 20:12, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:12, 27 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Addis Abeba

Addis Abeba (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seeing as this was turned into a redirect then reverted let's go to RfD with this. The article isn't needed because it's just based on a name. Can easily be covered in the main article Addis Ababa. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:11, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

*I strongly oppose the request for deletion. It is similar to "Piccola Roma" for Asmara, for example. I think wikipedia needs to be enlarged and not reduced .... The article shows in detail the improvements done by the Italian rule of the city.,,,and in the Addis Abeba article there it is nearly nothing about, only a few words. --Bljr (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bljr, now this page exists, this means we can use the content from this article in the main Addis Abada article. Also, "this also exists" is not an argument against deletion, and given the fact you've provided that article, I might also nominate that for deletion or redirect it as well. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit astonished by your answer....and I see that you nominated for deletion exactly after I put a reference of this simple article in the en. wikipedia, where there it is an Ethiopian nationalist who cancels all that is related to Italy in Ethiopia occupation & colonization of 1935-1941 (he also erased the article about the "italian Ethiopia" in en wikipedia with a clear "abuse of power" with his friends).....anyway, I see that you are a sysop, so I cannot do anything against your opinion: do whatever you want. I have never damaged wikipedia, but after two decades dealing with wikipedia abuses and "non-encyclopedical" nationalism...I know what to do in future! Anyway, have my best regards, BD --Bljr (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bljr, just to be clear, I am not associated with any POV on this whatsoever. This period of time should definitely be covered, I am just saying it should be on the same article as it is more beneficial to the reader. My adminship also doesn't reflect the weight of my opinion here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:20, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a clear redirect/merge situation: 'Addis Abeba' is the name of this city in German, also as the 'a' and 'e' are not stressed, the sound is really close. So, ideally merge both (and redirect the less common one to the more common one). -Eptalon (talk) 19:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

*:I think like Bljr. The deletion is going to "damage" our wikipedia. A TRUE encyclopedia MUST be expanded and not be reduced with mergers/redirects!--1993mode (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To fellow admin -- While this is due to close, please hold off on closing this for a bit. Thanks, CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Almost a week overdue? Eptalon (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I had filed en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brunodam and was hoping for a quick resolution there to help determine if there is socking involved at this RFD. A closing admin may want to check that out, or a checkuser might want to look at the accounts here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The two users above were confirmed to be the same by the English checkuser results. I've struck their votes/comments. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:11, 22 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Roy Lyster (2nd nomination)

Roy Lyster (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Second nomination: little has changed from my previous nomination which resulted in a SOFTDELETE closure. The only "new" information is his h-index and i10-index scores and number of citations. en:WP:NPROF specificially states "Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. "

As before: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The bulk of sources are primary or from his institutions/programs. The awards cited are from his own industry/organizations and don't confer overall notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep - Roy Lyster satisfies WP:ACADEMIC. He is a Professor Emeritus at McGill University, a major research institution, fulfilling the criterion of a distinguished professor appointment. His research in second-language education and immersion programs has over 24,000 citations and had a significant impact in his scholarly discipline.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-16619-08 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An emeritus title isn't necessarily the same as the "distinguished professor" criteria. Many institutions award that title without it being a mark of distinction. Additionally, the sources are not independent to be able to use for establishing notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:44, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Citation count does not alone determine notability, you need actual coverage from outside academia. Sources in the article are generally poor: a good number are not independent and are not in-depth. I cannot find any coverage elsewhere of the subject that would establish notability.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Octophobia

Octophobia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

HurricaneZeta has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No indication of notability for this phobia because it has no sources. I also couldn't find many sources for it and don't think it's worthy of an entry here. Maybe it would fit better in Wiktionary. HurricaneZeta (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep - I will admit I thought this was a Hoax at first, but it does seem to be real and covered by reliable sources, such as 1 and 2. There are also others out there, but I wasn't as sure about their reliability. The article needs a lot of cleanup, but I think there is notability for the topic. Garsh (talk) 20:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — A super niche fear like this doesn’t need a whole article, even if it really exists. Only one of the sentences in the article is useful and coherent as well, the rest being filler or nonsense. It would be better to simply mention it in another article, as a single sentence would do just fine. But even mention is a stretch. Anything can be feared and a fear name will exist. There isn’t any reason why this stands out. Sneakysasquatchfan (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Dollery

Jake Dollery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The single award mention seems non-significant. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note : After looking at this again, I'm thinking it's also AI generated. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

You may feel that the nomination is not significant, but the fact it was awarded is truthful, and seems a an insignificant reason to delete the entry. The ISSA annual awards is a legitimate event open to nominations from all over the world

Now, this is my first attempt at creating a Wiki entry so I'll happily accept that if there are ways to improve the entry I will certainly take that feedback on board and rectify any issue.

Other references to Jake Dollery's prescenec can be found on youtube or simply by entering a Google search for 'Jake Dollery' Jason Dollery (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources that show significant coverage of him? Google News just shows things from the radio station and him in a photo with a band. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I can't provide too much significance for this entry but I believe he does deserve recognition for his contribution to grassroots music through his radio show and the decades he's spent being a creative musical artist. Without an entry like this how will anyone know about the hard work he does?

There are a number of You Tube interviews with Jake. on podcasts and was recognised here:

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/perth-indie-rock-group-head-29038049

Otherwise, if this entry is deleted, then it will be a crying shame. Jason Dollery (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That source is literally just him in a picture with other people. He's not mentioned in the article, only the caption. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poor sources in the article. On top of that, everything here looks AI-generated to me.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:03, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. --Eptalon (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Muhammad Campaign Against Assyrians

Mir Muhammad Campaign Against Assyrians (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article seems to amount to a collection of non-notable events (as with similar articles that have been deleted, they’re mentioned in a sentence or two on a book) being conflated into a bigger article. The article suffers from a multiple of concerns including synthesis, POV pushing, and potential AI generation. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the article to address the concerns raised.

The previous version may have given the impression of a single unified "campaign", which was not supported explicitly by sources. I have rewritten the article to present the events as a series of historically documented attacks attributed to Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz, without synthesizing them into a single conflict.

All claims are now directly supported by reliable sources, and casualty figures have been presented cautiously where sources differ or are unclear.

The topic itself is covered in multiple academic and historical works (e.g. Badger, Layard, Wilmshurst), and therefore meets notability requirements. The article now reflects these sources in a neutral and properly structured manner.

I believe the revised version resolves the issues of synthesis and POV and the subject is suitable for inclusion as a standalone article or as a summary of material otherwise scattered across sources. Masare012 (talk) 21:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. --Eptalon (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Firman of Mir Muhammad

Firman of Mir Muhammad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability/verifiability of this article is not well established. The phrase "Firman of Mir Muhammad" appears nowhere but Wikipedia results related to this article. The phrase "The Firmān of Mīr-i-Kura" only appears in the title of a journal article that is cited elsewhere. Overall, this appears to be another Wikipedia entry that takes events that are covered in a sentence or two and conflates them or utilizes synthesis to create a grander event. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

'''Keep''' per nom. Mnshaxm (talk) 04:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't make sense... CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Because there is clear Sources of this event Masare012 (talk) 07:28, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Having sources vs. having significant coverage in reliable sources are two different things. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
But all the Sources are connected to one thing that happened when Mir Muhammad Conquest of Dasini Principality Masare012 (talk) 14:54, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
"keep" This evidence I have given does not think that the subjects are separate but all related to the incident of The Firmān of Mīr-i-Kura and The Dasni Empire was destroyed when Mir Muhammad conquered it and then Ali Beg was initially arrested and then executed Dasani053 (talk) 10:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not clear on what you're saying. Nothing I can piece out of it shows how this meets our standards for articles. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect – The underlying historical events appear to be real and supported by sources, but the article as currently written raises concerns under WP:SYNTH and WP:GNG. The specific title “Firman of Mir Muhammad” does not seem to be widely used in reliable sources, and the content appears to combine multiple events into a single narrative not clearly supported as such in the literature.

Rather than standalone notability, the material may be better covered within a broader article such as Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz or Yazidi persecutions in the 19th century. A merge or redirect would preserve the sourced content while avoiding original synthesis.DP-Author (talk) 13:58, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Rakowsky

Judy Rakowsky (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seemingly non-notable author. All of the listed sources were either primary (interviews) or not significant coverage. Much of the other sources online talk about her book rather than her. Garsh (talk) 04:38, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:38, 25 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jeannie Evans

Jeannie Evans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Currently seems to be a non-notable person. While she was a candidate, WP:POLITICIAN states that this isn't enough to show notability on its own, especially as she did not win the primary. A lot of the sources seem to be fairly routine candidate coverage that is unlikely to be sustained. This should likely be redirected to 2026 United States Senate election in Illinois. Garsh (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:05, 27 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open This End

Open This End (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. The bulk of sources here are listings on gallery or expo directory pages. A couple of the articles appear to be press releases or are published by "the editor" type bylines that suggest paid placement or other self-submitted type publishing. The remaining 2 or 3 sources don't truly establish the notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Comment: I just deleted (and protected) the page on Cristina Garcia-Lasuen, who seems to be associated with this project. The page was deleted as 'clearly AI generated'. We therefore cannot rule out that AI tools were also used to help create the page under discussion.--Eptalon (talk) 10:08, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Remon Garcia

Jorge Remon Garcia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. The bulk of the sources are primary or are press releases. The awards presented are not notable either. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:08, 25 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Ali Lawik's Ghazna and Kabul Campaigns

Abu Ali Lawik's Ghazna and Kabul Campaigns (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The campaign doesn't appear to be notable. Barras talk 20:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:44, 25 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Ridler

Isaac Ridler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 21:17, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:17, 25 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DWBC-AM

DWBC-AM (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced; no notability/verifiability to claim of it coming. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:07, 26 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Rabbids Movie 3: Mission to Mars

The Rabbids Movie 3: Mission to Mars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this movie. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:15, 26 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.