Rollup of 3 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• consolidate bootstrap docs #107116 (consolidate bootstrap docs)
• Provide structured suggestion for binding needing type on E0594 #107646 (Provide structured suggestion for binding needing type on E0594)
• Remove Esteban from review queues for a while #107661 (Remove Esteban from review queues for a while)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

[bors]

📌 Commit 47fc625 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 47fc625 with merge 50d3ba5...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 50d3ba5 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#107661	7d87032bc97e4c9dfec9a77161b0e3f9e377c3dd
#107646	4636033c58428ffacc7958c48858cdde40edf01b
#107116	ee6be2fdca3e66d6eedbae04282d1c641a543601

previous master: 3de7d7fb22

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (50d3ba5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.8%, 0.8%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.6%	[-1.1%, -0.4%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-2.4%, -1.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[2.6%, 3.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0