[doc](function)support bit_test function#1214
Merged
morningman merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom Oct 23, 2024
Merged
Conversation
zhangstar333
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
zhangstar333
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
HappenLee
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
support bit_test function doc: apache/doris-website#1214
zhangstar333
added a commit
to zhangstar333/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
support bit_test function doc: apache/doris-website#1214
BiteTheDDDDt
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [x] Confirm the release note - [x] Confirm test cases - [x] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
Gabriel39
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- Co-authored-by: yiguolei <yiguolei@gmail.com>
CalvinKirs
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
```
2024-11-01 19:42:52,521 WARN (mysql-nio-pool-117|9514) [StmtExecutor.execute():616] Analyze failed. stmt[250257, 59c581a512e7468f-b1cfd7d4b63fed33]
org.apache.doris.common.NereidsException: errCode = 2, detailMessage = java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at org.apache.doris.qe.StmtExecutor.executeByNereids(StmtExecutor.java:780) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.StmtExecutor.execute(StmtExecutor.java:601) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.StmtExecutor.queryRetry(StmtExecutor.java:564) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.StmtExecutor.execute(StmtExecutor.java:554) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.ConnectProcessor.executeQuery(ConnectProcessor.java:340) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.ConnectProcessor.handleQuery(ConnectProcessor.java:243) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.MysqlConnectProcessor.handleQuery(MysqlConnectProcessor.java:208) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.MysqlConnectProcessor.dispatch(MysqlConnectProcessor.java:236) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.MysqlConnectProcessor.processOnce(MysqlConnectProcessor.java:413) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.mysql.ReadListener.lambda$handleEvent$0(ReadListener.java:52) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) ~[?:?]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) ~[?:?]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840) ~[?:?]
Caused by: org.apache.doris.common.AnalysisException: errCode = 2, detailMessage = java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
... 13 more
Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1513) ~[?:?]
at org.apache.doris.load.ExportMgr.addExportJobAndRegisterTask(ExportMgr.java:120) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.nereids.trees.plans.commands.ExportCommand.run(ExportCommand.java:149) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.doris.qe.StmtExecutor.executeByNereids(StmtExecutor.java:749) ~[doris-fe.jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT]
... 12 more
```
### Check List (For Committer)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [x] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No colde files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
- Release note
<!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note -->
<!-- Add one line release note for this PR. -->
None
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
dataroaring
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2024
) ### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [x] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
airborne12
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> Introduced by #41625 <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #41625 Problem Summary: In #41625, the index compaction process was modified. During index compaction, the output rowset has not yet been built, so the output rowset cannot be accessed at this point. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [x] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
zhangstar333
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [x] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
CalvinKirs
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/55906 Due to security restrictions, the GitHub Actions bot cannot trigger workflows directly. Instead, we use doris-robot to initiate other CI runs. Only automatically generated PRs will prompt doris-robot to comment, and we verify the author and content to determine whether a workflow should be triggered. This approach does not affect the original CI process; it simply adds an additional trigger condition. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
CalvinKirs
added a commit
to CalvinKirs/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/55906 Due to security restrictions, the GitHub Actions bot cannot trigger workflows directly. Instead, we use doris-robot to initiate other CI runs. Only automatically generated PRs will prompt doris-robot to comment, and we verify the author and content to determine whether a workflow should be triggered. This approach does not affect the original CI process; it simply adds an additional trigger condition. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> (cherry picked from commit f04f044)
CalvinKirs
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
…43176) ### What problem does this PR solve? https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/55906 Due to security restrictions, the GitHub Actions bot cannot trigger workflows directly. Instead, we use doris-robot to initiate other CI runs. Only automatically generated PRs will prompt doris-robot to comment, and we verify the author and content to determine whether a workflow should be triggered. This approach does not affect the original CI process; it simply adds an additional trigger condition. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> (cherry picked from commit f04f044) ### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
CalvinKirs
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
zhangstar333
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
…nd.h (#43073) ### What problem does this PR solve? if compile_check_begin.h and compile_check_end.h are not correctly included, the following code between them will cause compilation errors. Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
airborne12
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
…er in segment compaction (#43114) ### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #41625 Problem Summary: Fix BUAF problem, stack like this ``` stack trace: *** 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421 1# 0x00007F5370ABD520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 2# pthread_kill at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89 3# raise at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27 4# abort at ./stdlib/abort.c:81 5# _gnu_cxx::_verbose_terminate_handler() [clone .cold] at ../../../../libstdc+-v3/libsupc+/vterminate.cc:75 6# _cxxabiv1::_terminate(void ()) at ../../../../libstdc+-v3/libsupc+/eh_terminate.cc:48 7# 0x000055D9E015B681 in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 8# 0x000055D9E015B7D4 in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 9# 0x000055D9E015BBC6 in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 10# void fmt::v7::detail::buffer::append(char const*, char const*) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 11# char const* fmt::v7::detail::parse_replacement_field, char, fmt::v7::basic_format_context, char> >&>(char const*, char const*, fmt::v7::detail::format_handler, char, fmt::v7::basic_format_context, char> >&) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 12# void fmt::v7::detail::vformat_to(fmt::v7::detail::buffer&, fmt::v7::basic_string_view, fmt::v7::basic_format_args::type>, fmt::v7::type_identity::type> >, fmt::v7::detail::locale_ref) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 13# fmt::v7::detail::vformat[abi:cxx11](fmt::v7::basic_string_view, fmt::v7::format_args) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 14# doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexDescriptor::get_temporary_index_path[abi:cxx11](std::basic_string_view >, std::basic_string_view >, long, long, std::basic_string_view >) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/inverted_index_desc.cpp:35 15# doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexFileWriter::open(doris::TabletIndex const*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/inverted_index_file_writer.cpp:45 16# doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexColumnWriterImpl<(doris::FieldType)7>::init_bkd_index() at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/inverted_index_writer.cpp:146 17# doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexColumnWriterImpl<(doris::FieldType)7>::init() at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/inverted_index_writer.cpp:116 18# doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexColumnWriter::create(doris::Field const*, std::unique_ptr >, doris::segment_v2::InvertedIndexFileWriter, doris::TabletIndex const*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/inverted_index_writer.cpp:698 19# doris::segment_v2::ScalarColumnWriter::init() at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/column_writer.cpp:483 20# doris::segment_v2::SegmentWriter::_create_column_writer(unsigned int, doris::TabletColumn const&, std::shared_ptr const&) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/segment_writer.cpp:258 21# doris::segment_v2::SegmentWriter::_create_writers(std::shared_ptr const&, std::vector > const&) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/segment_writer.cpp:307 22# doris::segment_v2::SegmentWriter::init(std::vector > const&, bool) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/segment_writer.cpp:276 23# doris::SegcompactionWorker::_do_compact_segments(std::shared_ptr, std::allocator > > >) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 24# doris::SegcompactionWorker::compact_segments(std::shared_ptr, std::allocator > > >) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/rowset/segcompaction.cpp:354 25# doris::StorageEngine::_handle_seg_compaction(std::shared_ptr, std::shared_ptr, std::allocator > > >, unsigned long) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/olap/olap_server.cpp:1121 26# std::_Function_handler, std::shared_ptr, std::allocator > > >)::$_0>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:291 27# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() in /mnt/hdd01/ci/master-deploy/be/lib/doris_be 28# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:499 29# start_thread at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442 30# 0x00007F5370BA1850 at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:83 172.20.50.120 last coredump sql: last SQL query not found ``` ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
airborne12
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #41625 Problem Summary: Refine case of index compaction, DO NOT need so much data. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [x] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
starocean999
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: migrate unset commands from original planner to nereids planner The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #43102 Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [x] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [x] Confirm the release note - [x] Confirm test cases - [x] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
zhangstar333
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: For `VLiteral`, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for loop. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: For `VLiteral`, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for loop. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: For `VLiteral`, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for loop. ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
airborne12
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
#43219) ### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #43114 Problem Summary: remove useless code and add size check ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
mrhhsg
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Issue Number: close #xxx <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- Co-authored-by: yiguolei <yiguolei@gmail.com>
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2026
…able (#60489) ### What problem does this PR solve? Array literal of ann search has nullable type in some cases, this is incorrect. Throw exception if it happens so that we can check the session vars. ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
…g finish_time_ (#60456) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close [#60454](#60454) Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [x] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
…g finish_time_ (#60456) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close [#60454](#60454) Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [x] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
pick #59896 This feature adds support for UPDATE_FLEXIBLE_COLUMNS mode in routine load, allowing partial updates where the columns to update are determined dynamically from each JSON row's fields rather than being fixed upfront. Key changes: - Add unique_key_update_mode property to routine load (UPSERT, UPDATE_FIXED_COLUMNS, UPDATE_FLEXIBLE_COLUMNS) - Validate flexible partial update constraints (JSON format only, no jsonpaths, no COLUMNS clause, no fuzzy_parse) - Support ALTER ROUTINE LOAD to change update mode - Add comprehensive regression tests for all scenarios - Add waitForTaskFinishMoW utility for MOW table tests Constraints for flexible partial update: - Only JSON format supported - Cannot use jsonpaths (columns determined from JSON fields) - Cannot use COLUMNS clause - Cannot use fuzzy_parse - Table must be MOW with skip_bitmap column enabled - Table cannot have variant columns ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
#60553) …ting benchmark (#60139) Uses LOG_DIR if set, otherwise config::sys_log_dir, else a relative pipe_tracing directory. This prevents fmt from seeing a null string pointer. ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- Signed-off-by: zhengyu <zhangzhengyu@selectdb.com>
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2026
Update FromStringTest, TextSerde, and CsvSerde unit tests to remove
dependency on the deleted wrapper_field.h header. Replace WrapperField
usage with hardcoded min/max values for IP addresses and direct string
comparisons for other types. Test logic and coverage are preserved.
- Remove wrapper_field.h includes
- Replace WrapperField::create_by_type() and related calls with explicit
values
- Update test data structures to remove wrapper field expectations
- Simplify nullable string tests to use test string directly
- Update comments to reflect serde-only testing approach
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? Pick #60253 #60393 #60481 #56956 #60334 #60494 ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
Gabriel39
added a commit
to Gabriel39/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
…0530) Update FromStringTest, TextSerde, and CsvSerde unit tests to remove dependency on the deleted wrapper_field.h header. Replace WrapperField usage with hardcoded min/max values for IP addresses and direct string comparisons for other types. Test logic and coverage are preserved. - Remove wrapper_field.h includes - Replace WrapperField::create_by_type() and related calls with explicit values - Update test data structures to remove wrapper field expectations - Simplify nullable string tests to use test string directly - Update comments to reflect serde-only testing approach Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: None - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
englefly
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
…n decomposeRepeat (#60610) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
zclllyybb
pushed a commit
to zclllyybb/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
zclllyybb
pushed a commit
to zclllyybb/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
zclllyybb
pushed a commit
to zclllyybb/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
…e#59771) ### What problem does this PR solve? apache#59327 introduces `LocalTablet`, apache#59460 introduces `LocalReplica`. These 2 pr will merge into 4.1. This pr add compatible code for LocalTablet and LocalReplica to make 4.1 can downgrade to 4.0. Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
dataroaring
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
…ion` (#60607) ### What problem does this PR solve? ``` 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/selectdb-core/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421 1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) [clone .part.0] at src/hotspot/os/posix/signals_posix.cpp:454 2# JVM_handle_linux_signal at src/hotspot/os/posix/signals_posix.cpp:641 3# 0x00007F6D2FBC6520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 4# je_tcache_bin_flush_small at /root/selectdb-core/thirdparty/src/jemalloc-5.3.0/doris_build/../src/tcache.c:529 5# je_free_default at /root/selectdb-core/thirdparty/src/jemalloc-5.3.0/doris_build/../src/jemalloc.c:3014 6# std::_Hashtable<std::pair<long, long>, std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long co nst, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std ::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<std::pair<long, long> >, doris::MapKeyHash, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_range d_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::_M_move_assign(std::_Hashtable<std::pair<long, long>, std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered _map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_ to<std::pair<long, long> >, doris::MapKeyHash, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >&&, std::integral_constant<bool, true>) at /root/tools/ldb-16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/hashtable.h:1342 7# doris::TabletHotspot::get_top_n_hot_partition(std::vector<doris::THotTableMessage, std::allocator<doris::THotTableMessage> >*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 8# doris::CloudBackendService::get_top_n_hot_partitions(doris::TGetTopNHotPartitionsResponse&, doris::TGetTopNHotPartitionsRequest const&) at /root/selectdb-core/be/src/cloud/cloud_backend_service.cpp:86 9# doris::BackendServiceProcessor::process_get_top_n_hot_partitions(int, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, void*) at /root/selectdb-core/gensrc/build/gen_cpp/BackendService.cpp:8102 10# doris::BackendServiceProcessor::dispatchCall(apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int, void*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 11# apache::thrift::TDispatchProcessor::process(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol>, std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol>, void*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 12# apache::thrift::server::TConnectedClient::run() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 13# apache::thrift::server::TThreadedServer::TConnectedClientRunner::run() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 14# apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread::threadMain(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 15# void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>&&) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 16# std::__invoke_result<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >::type std::__invoke<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >(void (*&&)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>&&) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 17# void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul, 1ul>) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 18# std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > >::operator()() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 19# std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > > >::_M_run() in /opt/sele ctdb/be/lib/doris_be 20# execute_native_thread_routine at ../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc:84 21# 0x00007F6D2FC18AC3 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 22# __clone in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ``` None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
…ion` (#60607) ### What problem does this PR solve? ``` 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/selectdb-core/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421 1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) [clone .part.0] at src/hotspot/os/posix/signals_posix.cpp:454 2# JVM_handle_linux_signal at src/hotspot/os/posix/signals_posix.cpp:641 3# 0x00007F6D2FBC6520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 4# je_tcache_bin_flush_small at /root/selectdb-core/thirdparty/src/jemalloc-5.3.0/doris_build/../src/tcache.c:529 5# je_free_default at /root/selectdb-core/thirdparty/src/jemalloc-5.3.0/doris_build/../src/jemalloc.c:3014 6# std::_Hashtable<std::pair<long, long>, std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long co nst, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std ::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<std::pair<long, long> >, doris::MapKeyHash, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_range d_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::_M_move_assign(std::_Hashtable<std::pair<long, long>, std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered _map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::pair<long, long> const, std::unordered_map<long, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue, std::hash<long>, std::equal_to<long>, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, doris::TabletHotspotMapValue> > > > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_ to<std::pair<long, long> >, doris::MapKeyHash, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >&&, std::integral_constant<bool, true>) at /root/tools/ldb-16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/hashtable.h:1342 7# doris::TabletHotspot::get_top_n_hot_partition(std::vector<doris::THotTableMessage, std::allocator<doris::THotTableMessage> >*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 8# doris::CloudBackendService::get_top_n_hot_partitions(doris::TGetTopNHotPartitionsResponse&, doris::TGetTopNHotPartitionsRequest const&) at /root/selectdb-core/be/src/cloud/cloud_backend_service.cpp:86 9# doris::BackendServiceProcessor::process_get_top_n_hot_partitions(int, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, void*) at /root/selectdb-core/gensrc/build/gen_cpp/BackendService.cpp:8102 10# doris::BackendServiceProcessor::dispatchCall(apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int, void*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 11# apache::thrift::TDispatchProcessor::process(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol>, std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol>, void*) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 12# apache::thrift::server::TConnectedClient::run() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 13# apache::thrift::server::TThreadedServer::TConnectedClientRunner::run() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 14# apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread::threadMain(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 15# void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>&&) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 16# std::__invoke_result<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >::type std::__invoke<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> >(void (*&&)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>&&) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 17# void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul, 1ul>) in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 18# std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > >::operator()() in /opt/selectdb/be/lib/doris_be 19# std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread>), std::shared_ptr<apache::thrift::concurrency::Thread> > > >::_M_run() in /opt/sele ctdb/be/lib/doris_be 20# execute_native_thread_routine at ../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc:84 21# 0x00007F6D2FC18AC3 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 22# __clone in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ``` None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
dataroaring
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2026
…during warmup (#60622) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: During initial tablet loading, the load_tablet lambda inside SingleFlight calls sync_tablet_rowsets -> _add_rowsets_directly -> _submit_segment_download_task -> rowset_meta->fs(), which internally calls ExecEnv::get_tablet() for the same tablet_id. Since the tablet hasn't been inserted into cache yet, this triggers a second SingleFlight lookup for the same key, causing event.wait() to deadlock (waiting for itself). Fix by pre-setting the encryption algorithm on RowsetMeta before calling fs() in _submit_segment_download_task, so _determine_encryption_once returns the cached value without re-entering get_tablet. ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
CalvinKirs
added a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2026
…umns for external tables (#60636) … ## Proposed changes Fix the issue where column binding fails for external tables (Hive, Iceberg, etc.) when users reference table names with original case in SQL. Problem When querying external Hive tables, the following SQL fails: SELECT * FROM TPCH50.DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1 WHERE DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1.dt = '20260108' LIMIT 10; -- Error: Unknown column 'dt' in 'DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1' in FILTER clause But using an alias works: SELECT * FROM TPCH50.DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1 AS DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1 WHERE DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1.dt = '20260108' LIMIT 10; -- Success Root Cause 1. Hive Metastore stores table names in lowercase (e.g., dim_lineitem_core_od001_v1) 2. The slot qualifier uses table.getName() which returns the lowercase HMS table name 3. Users reference the table with original case in SQL (e.g., DIM_LINEITEM_CORE_OD001_V1.dt) 4. ExpressionAnalyzer.sameTableName() performs case-sensitive comparison when lower_case_table_names != 1, causing binding to fail Solution Change sameTableName() to always use case-insensitive comparison for table names. This is consistent with: - Catalog name comparison (already case-insensitive at line 1079) - Database name comparison (already case-insensitive at line 1092) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2026
…60593) Update FromStringTest, TextSerde, and CsvSerde unit tests to remove dependency on the deleted wrapper_field.h header. Replace WrapperField usage with hardcoded min/max values for IP addresses and direct string comparisons for other types. Test logic and coverage are preserved. - Remove wrapper_field.h includes - Replace WrapperField::create_by_type() and related calls with explicit values - Update test data structures to remove wrapper field expectations - Simplify nullable string tests to use test string directly - Update comments to reflect serde-only testing approach Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: None - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dataroaring
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
…e cache (#60609) Support selective caching of index files only during compaction in cloud mode. Changes: - Add two mBool configs to control index-only caching for base and cumulative compaction: * enable_base_compaction_output_write_index_only (default: false) * enable_cumu_compaction_output_write_index_only (default: false) - Extend RowsetWriterContext with compaction_output_write_index_only field to mark whether only index files should be cached - Modify get_file_writer_options() to accept is_index_file parameter: * When compaction_output_write_index_only=true and is_index_file=false, set write_file_cache=false to skip caching data files * Index files continue to be cached normally - Update file writer creation call sites to pass is_index_file parameter: * Index file writers: pass true * Segment (data) file writers: pass false Benefits: - Reduces cache pressure by avoiding caching large data files during compaction - Preserves index file caching for query performance - Provides separate control for base and cumulative compaction strategies - Maintains backward compatibility with default settings ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
dataroaring
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
…ut_value (#60664) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #56930 Problem Summary: Under the condition where `isEof = false`, the calculation of the timeout in `updateAdaptiveTimeout `also needs to take into account `Config.routine_load_task_min_timeout_sec`. ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
…ut_value (#60664) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #56930 Problem Summary: Under the condition where `isEof = false`, the calculation of the timeout in `updateAdaptiveTimeout `also needs to take into account `Config.routine_load_task_min_timeout_sec`. ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? Problem Summary: ### Release note Cherry-pick #58858 ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
dataroaring
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? ### Cold run test result - Environment: 1 FE + 2 BE(aliyun, [ecs.i4g.16xlarge](https://help.aliyun.com/zh/ecs/user-guide/instance-families-with-local-ssds#i4g), 2.7 GHz Intel® Xeon® Scalable (Ice Lake) processors with high-performance local NVMe SSDs) - Network baseline bandwidth **32 Gbit/s** on each machine - Duplicate table, 16 buckets, 6178831001 rows, data size is 396.837 GB - Cold run means **query without any doris page, OS page cache or local disk file cache, all data will be fetched from S3**. - Query: `select count(user_id) from test_dup3 where env_id % 10 = 0 and user_id%10=0 and time % 10 =0 and event_id % 10 = 0 and length(domain) % 10 = 0 and length(path) % 10 = 0 and length(query)%10=0;` - For this query, each BE will download **114GB** data to local disk file cache from S3 - 8 instance * 48 scanner = 384 scanner on each BE, and scanner thread pool size is set to 48 ||no prefetch|prefetch_block_size=2| |---|---|---| | query time | 2min47sec | 39sec273ms | | network bandwidth</br>(on one BE) | <img width="960" height="720" alt="slow" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/73a5d621-dc9c-4885-b336-9975230a40c9" />| <img width="960" height="720" alt="fast" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0e147c4a-7b13-4eaa-a6ea-a8c171ce1c52" />| based on #59476 ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2026
…, Fix array_join to handle non-constant columns. (#60707) ### What problem does this PR solve? #60612 #60575 ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
…er in CostBasedRewriteJob (#59517) ### What problem does this PR solve? cost based rewrite job may contaminate StatementContext.rewrittenCteProducer fix solution: clone current rewrittenCteProducer, and restore it after each call to getCost(...) Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? pick #60764 ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2026
…ception (#60754) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #60746 Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [x] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> hard to reproduce - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2026
…ception (#60754) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #60746 Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [x] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> hard to reproduce - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
yiguolei
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #60347 Problem Summary: Before: ```text Doris> select now() day_hour; ERROR 1105 (HY000): errCode = 2, detailMessage = extraneous input 'day_hour' expecting {<EOF>, ';'}(line 1, pos 13) ``` After: ```text Doris> select now() day_hour; +---------------------+ | day_hour | +---------------------+ | 2026-02-16 02:31:36 | +---------------------+ ``` ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to apache/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #60347 Problem Summary: Before: ```text Doris> select now() day_hour; ERROR 1105 (HY000): errCode = 2, detailMessage = extraneous input 'day_hour' expecting {<EOF>, ';'}(line 1, pos 13) ``` After: ```text Doris> select now() day_hour; +---------------------+ | day_hour | +---------------------+ | 2026-02-16 02:31:36 | +---------------------+ ``` ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Versions
Languages