The permanent coup

"Russiagate," the Mueller investigation, impeachment, the "weaponization" of coronavirus, & now the riots—they all have a common purpose: to remove from office the man who obstructed plans to radically transform America, argues @LeeSmithDC.

WATCH FULL 👉 https://t.co/zXgVQkbZFO pic.twitter.com/YrZ2mNVW34

— American Thought Leaders with Jan Jekielek (@AmThoughtLeader) August 23, 2020

The weaponization of our intelligence community in order to overturn a Presidential election

There are two books that have been recently written that explain the attempted coup against President Trump. Roger Kimball writes in PowerLine,

about the mainstream media’s policy of omertà regarding Andy McCarthy’s Ball of Collusion and Lee Smith’s The Plot Against the President. Both books, as you say, are essential to our understanding of what has turned out to be the most serious political scandal in the history of the American Republic.

I am not being hyperbolic. And I say this frankly even though I am the publisher of McCarthy’s book because the nature of the scandal—the weaponization of our intelligence community in order to overturn a Presidential election—is at once so grievous and so misreported by the organs of a co-opted Fourth Estate that the usual niceties about declaring an interest pale before the egregious reality of this attempted coup. Again, I am not being hyperbolic in deploying the phrase “attempted coup.”

What we have seen in the response to both books is a perfect storm of unspoken media collusion to bury the books in order to preserve The Narrative: that the Mueller investigation, like the impeachment farce, were justified even though not a scintilla of evidence against Donald Trump or his campaign has been adduced to support the frenzied efforts to besmirch him and, ultimately, to remove him from office. The actions of the deep state in this episode are despicable, but no more so than the actions of such discredited entities as The New York Times and The Washington Post, both of which have exploited this scandal to squander what little credibility they had left.

Fortunately, the public at large has become less and less beholden to such sclerotic entities (and one must include here formerly respectable outlets such as CNN). One sign of this is the fact that both books are bestsellers, a token not only of their wide appeal but also of the relative impotence of such once-powerful organs as the Times and the Post to censor opinions of which they disapprove.

It says a great deal that the only place these books appear in The New York Times is on the page listing bestsellers. McCarthy and Smith have done yeoman’s work and deserve the gratitude of the general public. Without their efforts—and the efforts of such public servants as Devin Nunes—we would still be in the dark about this wholesale assault on the foundations of our democracy. Thanks for laying it out so clearly.

Read more here.

Complicity of the press, the role of the Obama administration in perpetuating the Russia hoax, and the revelation of the coup

In PowerLine, Scott Johnson writes about

ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN, TAKE 2.

...Lee Smith is the author of The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in US History.

...Lee Smith is a great journalist. This bears on one of the book’s principal themes: the complicity of the press in peddling the hoax alleging the collusion of the Trump campaign with organs of the Russian government. In peddling the hoax, the most prominent organs of the mainstream media were the accomplices of the perpetrators. The book cites the relevant stories and relentlessly names names demonstrating the “collusion” of the press with the Clinton campaign and the government — the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Justice — in peddling the Russian hoax as news.

Within the profession, there has been no reckoning for the misconduct that the book makes out. On the contrary, at the profession’s upper reaches, we have seen only the renewed commitment to carry on the campaign to remove Trump from office. This book may be the closest we ever get to the day of reckoning that is due the press.

...A second theme of the book is the role of the Obama administration in perpetrating the Russia hoax. Following the 2016 election, the Russia hoax involved the orchestrated disempowerment of the incoming administration and the removal of Trump from office. While the press held itself out as pursuing Trump in a scandal with echoes of Watergate, the scandal represented the handiwork of the Obama administration and the press served as its handmaiden. Referring to the method of operation pioneered by Obama to support the Iran deal, Smith puts it this way: “[I]t was Obama who was most like Nixon, because Trump’s predecessor used the resources of the federal government, sensitive surveillance program and staff, to spy on his opponents.”

Smith writes: “The coup started almost immediately after the polls closed.” The ground had been well laid by then.

A third theme of the book is the revelation of the coup. This gives the book its subtitle: “The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in US History.” The book reminds us that much of what we know about the Russia hoax is attributable to the work of Devin Nunes, and it reports how Nunes has paid the price. I have embedded a copy of the Nunes memo released on February 2018 at the bottom of this post. For much of what we have learned to date we owe Rep. Nunes a debt of gratitude.

The book implicitly raises the question who wrote the Steele Dossier. Smith seems to doubt that it was Christopher Steele. He notes that in an October 2016 meeting with Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec — reported here by John Solomon — Steele forgot his lines. Whodunnit may be less important in this case than that it was done by those working on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party. For our knowledge of that critical fact we have Devin Nunes to thank.

In calling out his professional colleagues for the wrongs they have done and for giving credit where credit is due to Devin Nunes and his staff, this book administers justice to the extent that it is possible for a reporter and analyst to do so. We can only hope that it is a preface to the administration of justice the old-fashioned way.
Read more here.