A Google executive sparked a fierce backlash from employees by using the word “family” in a weekly, company-wide presentation, according to internal documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.Read more here.
Many Google employees became angry that the term was used while discussing a product aimed at children, because it implied that families have children, the documents show. The backlash grew large enough that a Google vice president addressed the controversy and solicited feedback on how the company could become more inclusive.
TheDCNF received the documents from a source who insisted upon anonymity in order to share them. (RELATED: Google Employees Debated Burying Conservative Media In Search)
One employee stormed out of the March 2017 presentation after a presenter “continued to show (awesome) Unicorn product features which continually use the word ‘family’ as a synonym for ‘household with children,'” he explained in an internal thread. That employee posted an extended rant, which was well-received by his colleagues, on why linking families to children is “offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong.”
He wrote:
This is a diminishing and disrespectful way to speak. If you mean “children”, say “children”; we have a perfectly good word for it. “Family friendly” used as a synonym for “kid friendly” means, to me, “you and yours don’t count as a family unless you have children”. And while kids may often be less aware of it, there are kids without families too, you know.
The use of “family” as a synonym for “with children” has a long-standing association with deeply homophobic organizations. This does not mean we should not use the word “family” to refer to families, but it means we must doggedly insist that family does not imply children.
Even the sense, “suitable for the whole family”, which you might think is unobjectionable, is totally wrong too. It only works if we have advance shared conception of what “the whole family” is, and that is almost always used to mean a household with two adults, of opposite sex, in a romantic/sexual relationship, with two or more of their own children. If you mean that as a synonym for “suitable for all people” stop and notice the extraordinary unlikelihood of such a thought! So “suitable for the whole family” doesn’t mean “all people”, it means “all people in families”, which either means that all those other people aren’t in families, or something even worse. Use the word “family” to mean a loving assemblage of people who may or may not live together and may or may not include people of any particular age. STOP using it to mean “children”. It’s offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong.
This blog is looking for wisdom, to have and to share. It is also looking for other rare character traits like good humor, courage, and honor. It is not an easy road, because all of us fall short. But God is love, forgiveness and grace. Those who believe in Him and repent of their sins have the promise of His Holy Spirit to guide us and show us the Way.
Showing posts with label families. Show all posts
Showing posts with label families. Show all posts
Friday, January 18, 2019
It is wrong to link families to children?
Please help me understand this. Peter Hasson reports in the Daily Caller,
Thursday, January 03, 2019
Negligence on a massive scale
"Once our leaders understood they could get rich from marijuana, marijuana became ubiquitous. If you want to put America first, you've got to put its families first!"
The opening monolog by Tucker Carlson is superb! He informs us how Romney became rich at Bain Capital.
Making the world safe for banking, while simultaneously prosecuting ever more foreign wars. Here in the U.S. and in many other countries, voters are revolting against leaders who refuse to improve their lives.
What if happiness were the goal for America? What would be the ingredients? Dignity, purpose, self-control, independence, and above all, deep relationships with other people.
Culture and economics are inseparably intertwined.
In many ways, rural America now looks like Detroit.
Is marriage now a luxury only the affluent can afford? Both parties are ignoring the crisis in marriage, first in the inner cities, now in rural America which was so hard hit by the loss of good paying jobs.
Is our country fair? Cohesive? Can anyone make a decent living outside of the big cities? Does our country actually care about families? Should we worship market capitalism?
I could see Tucker Carlson running for President! I would like to read his book that is currently on the best seller list.
The opening monolog by Tucker Carlson is superb! He informs us how Romney became rich at Bain Capital.
Making the world safe for banking, while simultaneously prosecuting ever more foreign wars. Here in the U.S. and in many other countries, voters are revolting against leaders who refuse to improve their lives.
What if happiness were the goal for America? What would be the ingredients? Dignity, purpose, self-control, independence, and above all, deep relationships with other people.
Culture and economics are inseparably intertwined.
In many ways, rural America now looks like Detroit.
Is marriage now a luxury only the affluent can afford? Both parties are ignoring the crisis in marriage, first in the inner cities, now in rural America which was so hard hit by the loss of good paying jobs.
Is our country fair? Cohesive? Can anyone make a decent living outside of the big cities? Does our country actually care about families? Should we worship market capitalism?
I could see Tucker Carlson running for President! I would like to read his book that is currently on the best seller list.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)